REVIEW: Welsh Missionaries and British imperialism by Andrew May (Manchester University Press, 2013)

Cover ImageI have recently been reading Andrew May’s Welsh missionaries and British imperialism for a review in the Journal of Colonialism and Colonial Studies and can say that it is both excellent, and beautifully written. Focusing on the experience of both mission and empire in the Khasi Hills of north-east India, May engages in a close analysis of a particular region in order to address the broader themes of Britishness and Welshness; Christianity and empire; distance, authority and identity. His particular emphasis is on the breaking down of homogenous labels through close attention to the dynamics of everyday interaction and encounter. After all, ‘the practised subjectivities of individual British agents in the hills – the ways in which they actually experienced the world and intervened in it – could defy the simple nomenclature of their titles’ (p. 269).

As if that sort of history isn’t enticing enough, for those of us interested in colonial family history, there is a great deal more to lure us into its pages. To start with, the personal, present-day connections and actions of the author book-end this story. Andrew May’s connection to his great-great grandfather (the main protagonist of the book) starts with the chiseled initials of his ancestor in Llifior Mill, north-mid Wales, and ends in an anonymous, but not unmarked, grave along the Scott Road – possibly the grave of that same ancestor’s illegitimate daughter. May’s family connection to the content of this book is lightly worn – in May’s own words ‘this book is not a family history, but it glimpses in afterthought the diverse and fragmented lives of empire’s descendents’ (p. 284). But his close attention to the ‘micro-narrative’, and the everyday lived experience of colonialism is I think certainly linked to that sense of connection. [Happily for us, Andrew has kindly agreed to a guest-post on the topic of writing his family’s history for us here at the blog. Stay tuned for that, to be posted next week.]

In the content of the book too, there is a great deal of interest for those of us concerned with the idea and practice of colonial families: colonial dynasties get attention throughout, and particularly in Chapter Seven (pp. 114-27) which gives them sustained attention. The idea and ideal of the missionary family is often present – both its normative aspect and the performance of familiarity, as well as when family relationships break down or are ruptured (see for example Chapter Ten, pp. 173-95). The dynamics of (family) connections and disconnections, and issues relative to intimacy and distance, meanwhile, are also dealt with throughout – as is perhaps inevitable when looking at mission and empire in this close manner – see for example pp. 258-64. For families on the colonial and spiritual frontiers ‘unsteadiness and disorientation dogged them across the shape-shifting landscape of empire’ (p. 285). For May, ‘this history has been my attempt to grab on to something, to rescue micro-narratives of “what is forgotten as well as what is remembered”, to steady myself and for a moment find meaning and compassion in a confusing landscape’ (p. 285).

For me, it is this which is the most important aspect of this book – and something I strive for in my own writing. To recognise and remember that in writing history we are dealing with ‘real people making real choices’ (p. 5); people living their lives and making everyday decisions within the broader frameworks of meta-history. This should not serve to downplay the importance of the broader picture, of for example the realities, inequalities and violence of colonialism. Rather,  it is to recognise the importance of the individual within that broader history – whether as conniving and arrogant imperialists (in various guises), or as caring and conscientious individuals; and more often than not with elements of both within them.

‘If the first instinct of this book is to disrupt the monolithic category of missionary, it has a further and wilful purpose to penetrate other essentialising labels – British, Indian, soldier, scientist, merchant, administrator – that can become easy shorthand for broad processes of the expansion of European hegemony, but which blur the complex interactions and negotiations of imperialists and indigenous peoples.’

As a ‘local-level study of the ways in which macro-processes play out for individual people’ (p. 5) this book makes a striking intervention into the history of mission and empire, and is a must-read for anyone with an interest in colonial family history, and the history of both empire and mission more broadly.

– Emily Manktelow

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Book Reviews, Publications and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s